Current ranking

Best Air Fryers in May 2026

Compare the best air fryers for crisping, capacity, cleanup, controls, footprint, and family fit, with clear tradeoffs for each ranked pick.

Published 2026-05-14 · Updated 2026-05-14 · Reviewed by Editorial Review Desk

How We Chose the Best Air Fryers

We rank air fryers against weighted criteria for cooking results, household fit, controls, cleanup, footprint, support documentation, and owner-feedback patterns. Official specs and independent reviews carry the most weight; thin owner-sentiment coverage lowers confidence instead of being treated as proof.

Rank #1
Editorial score 88/100

Ranked first because it has the strongest all-around mainstream profile: a 6-quart basket size that fits many households, ClearCook window utility, dishwasher-safe parts, simple controls, ETL/spec documentation, and repeated independent editorial support without the bulk of dual-zone or oven-style designs.

Best For
  • Most households wanting a proven 6-quart basket air fryer
  • Users who value a viewing window and simple controls
Tradeoffs
  • Not a dual-zone model
  • Owner sentiment needs a second independent channel
Open Amazon affiliate link
Rank #2
Editorial score 87/100

Ranked second on the strength of its performance and feature case: 6-quart capacity, 90-450°F range, nine functions, five fan speeds, ceramic-coated dishwasher-safe basket parts, and strong editorial praise for speed and crisping. It misses first place because owner-sentiment coverage is thinner than the best all-around pick.

Best For
  • Three- to five-person households
  • Buyers wanting speed, presets, and ceramic-coated dishwasher-safe parts
Tradeoffs
  • Owner-feedback coverage is below target
  • No dual-zone cooking
Open Amazon affiliate link
Rank #3
Editorial score 85/100

Ranked third as the strongest researched large-family dual-basket choice: 10 quarts split into two 5-quart baskets, six cooking programs, and independent coverage supporting fast, flexible two-food cooking. The bulky side-by-side body keeps it below the best mainstream 6-quart picks for everyday kitchens.

Best For
  • Families cooking mains and sides together
  • Large-batch wings, fries, and two-temperature meals
Tradeoffs
  • Large side-by-side footprint
  • Owner sentiment still needs a second independent channel
Open Amazon affiliate link
Rank #4
Editorial score 84/100

Ranked fourth because it is the best oven-style finalist for shoppers who want air frying plus serious countertop-oven versatility. Its 13 functions, 1-cubic-foot interior, 1800W power, and strong support/warranty documentation are compelling, but the large oven footprint and different use case make it less universal than the top basket models.

Best For
  • Households replacing or supplementing a full oven
  • Cooks who want air fry, toast, bake, roast, proof, dehydrate, and slow-cook modes
Tradeoffs
  • Large countertop footprint
  • Not as simple or compact as basket fryers
Open Amazon affiliate link
Rank #5
Editorial score 81/100

Ranked fifth as the compact-simple pick: it has multiple editorial signals, two retailer/spec-feedback channels, and a small footprint that works for singles, couples, and tight kitchens. Its 4-quart capacity and basic feature set prevent it from competing with the top larger or more versatile models.

Best For
  • Singles, couples, and small kitchens
  • Buyers who want a simple proven basket air fryer
Tradeoffs
  • Small 4-quart capacity
  • Basic feature set
Open Amazon affiliate link
Rank #6
Editorial score 80/100

Ranked sixth as a promising but under-corroborated large smart basket. The dual heating elements, 6.8-quart capacity, 12 functions, and app controls are strong on paper and supported by editorial coverage, but thin independent owner feedback and possible smart-control friction keep it below better-corroborated picks.

Best For
  • Users who want one large basket with top and bottom heating
  • Smart-home/app-control households
Tradeoffs
  • Independent owner feedback is thin
  • Smart-control friction risk
  • Marketplace identity needs final review
Open Amazon affiliate link
Rank #7
Editorial score 79/100

Ranked seventh for a distinctive reason: it brings 10-quart dual-basket cooking to narrower counters by stacking vertically instead of spreading sideways. It trails the DZ550 because official product/spec coverage and owner-sentiment depth are weaker, and the tall format is a poor fit under low cabinets.

Best For
  • Families needing dual baskets with less counter width
  • Kitchens where vertical footprint is preferable to side-by-side width
Tradeoffs
  • Thin official product/spec coverage
  • Owner-feedback depth is weak
  • Tall body may not fit under cabinets
Open Amazon affiliate link
Rank #8
Editorial score 76/100

Ranked eighth because its windowed 6-quart basket, 1800W power, dishwasher-safe crisper basket, toss reminder, auto-pause, and warranty language are shopper-useful. It takes a major penalty because the official product page marks it discontinued and lab/editorial notes raise performance/evenness caveats.

Best For
  • Shoppers who prioritize a viewing window and simple 6-quart basket controls
  • Users attracted to long warranty language
Tradeoffs
  • Official page marks it discontinued
  • Performance/evenness caveats
  • Owner sentiment lacks independent corroboration
Open Amazon affiliate link
Rank #9
Editorial score 74/100

Ranked ninth as a source-gap pick rather than a top recommendation. Philips support and manuals make the NA350 easy to verify, and the dual-basket family format is credible, but product-specific owner feedback, regional identity, and US-market corroboration are too weak for a higher score.

Best For
  • Families wanting dual baskets from a legacy appliance brand
  • Users who value official support/manual availability
Tradeoffs
  • Weak product-specific owner sentiment
  • Regional model/identity ambiguity
  • Bulky dual-basket format
Open Amazon affiliate link